Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 91(1): 40-46, 2024 Jan 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38167397

RESUMO

The practice of outpatient medicine is demanding, encompasses a wide scope of practice, and leaves little time for internists to stay up to date with the current literature. This article reviews 5 studies published in 2022 and 2023 that have the potential to change the practice of outpatient medicine. Topics covered include chronic kidney disease, secondary cardiovascular disease, kidney stones, obesity, and lipid management.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Médicos , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Medicina Baseada em Evidências
3.
Kidney Int Rep ; 7(10): 2186-2195, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36217511

RESUMO

Introduction: Diuretic use may reduce volume-related complications in hemodialysis. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of furosemide in patients with hemodialysis-dependent kidney failure. Methods: We conducted an open label, single-arm, 18-week, dose titration pilot study of oral furosemide (maximum dose 320 mg/day) among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who reported at least 1 cup of urine output per day. The primary efficacy outcome was an increase from baseline to a specified threshold of 24-hour urine volume, with the threshold based on baseline urine volume (<200 ml/day vs. ≥200 ml/day). Safety outcomes included hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia, and tolerability was assessed by prespecified patient-reported symptoms. Results: Of the 39 participants, 28 (72%) received the expected furosemide dose, 3 (8%) underwent dose reduction, 5 (12%) discontinued furosemide without dose reduction, and 3 (8%) underwent dose reduction and subsequently discontinued furosemide. The median (quartile 1, quartile 3) baseline 24-hour urine volume was 290 ml (110, 740), and the maximum, average daily study furosemide dose ranged from 69 mg/day to 320 mg/d. The urine output efficacy outcome was met by 12 (33%), 11 (33%), and 7 (22%) participants at weeks 5, 12, and 18, respectively, in the intention-to-treat analysis, and by 12 (39%), 9 (35%), and 7 (28%) participants at weeks 5, 12, and 18, respectively, in the on-treatment analysis. There were no electrolyte, furosemide level, or patient-reported hearing change safety events. Conclusion: Furosemide was generally safe and well tolerated, but only one-third of participants met the efficacy definition at week 5. The clinical importance of the efficacy findings is uncertain.

4.
J Diabetes Complications ; 33(12): 107417, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31669065

RESUMO

As the diabetes epidemic in the United States continues to worsen, so too does the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR). DR is divided broadly into nonproliferative and proliferative stages, with or without vision-threatening macular edema. Progression to proliferative DR is associated with vision loss that is often irreparable, and a rapid decline in health-related quality of life. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A is upregulated in the diabetic eye, and has been identified as a key driver of DR pathogenesis. With this perspective, we review the published phase III clinical trial data of anti-VEGF therapies approved for the treatment of DR in the United States. Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale, in which an improvement of ≥2 steps is considered clinically significant, approximately one-third of patients with DR and macular edema experience this level of improvement after 1 year of treatment with either ranibizumab or aflibercept. The rates of clinically significant DR improvement with ranibizumab could be twice that in the subgroup of patients with moderately severe or severe nonproliferative DR and macular edema. These clinical trial data indicate that intraocular inhibition of VEGF is a rational approach for the management of DR.


Assuntos
Retinopatia Diabética/tratamento farmacológico , Endocrinologia/tendências , Oftalmologia/tendências , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Angiogênese/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Retinopatia Diabética/epidemiologia , Progressão da Doença , Endocrinologia/métodos , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Edema Macular/epidemiologia , Edema Macular/etiologia , Oftalmologia/métodos , Ranibizumab/administração & dosagem , Ranibizumab/efeitos adversos , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/efeitos adversos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Acuidade Visual
5.
Am J Cancer Res ; 4(5): 436-44, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25232486

RESUMO

Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent primary malignant brain tumor in adults. It is an aggressive primary brain neoplasm, associated with a poor prognosis and median survival of less than 1 year. Approximately 50% of patients diagnosed with malignant gliomas in the United States are over the age of 65. Advancing age and poor performance status are two variables that have found to negatively affect prognosis. When compared to younger patients, not only is the treatment of elderly patients associated with decreased efficacy but also greater toxicity. As a result, elderly patients often receive less aggressive treatment and are excluded from clinical trials. There are many challenges in the treatment of elderly patients with GBM including increased surgical morbidity and mortality as well as increased toxicity to radiation and chemotherapy. As such, the optimal therapy remains unclear and controversial for the elderly malignant glioma population.

6.
J Clin Neuromuscul Dis ; 15(4): 143-6, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24872211

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The combined sensory index (CSI), a sensitive composite score of 3 median sensory comparison studies, may still be underutilized in diagnosing mild cases of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Our goal was to compare the effectiveness of the "standard" median digit 2 (D2) sensory study to a CSI algorithm in diagnosing mild CTS. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with typical CTS symptoms and signs. Electrodiagnostically normal patients and those having mild CTS diagnosed by D2 or CSI algorithm were separated into groups. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included, and 51 (68.9%) were diagnosed with mild CTS. Of the 51, 31 (60.8%) were diagnosed using the CSI algorithm, and 20 (39.2%) were diagnosed using D2 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the CSI algorithm is significantly more effective than the D2 to diagnose mild CTS. If mild CTS is diagnosed earlier, treatment can be initiated sooner and morbidity can likely prevented.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/fisiopatologia , Eletrodiagnóstico/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Eletrodiagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Eletromiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurônios Motores , Condução Nervosa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Células Receptoras Sensoriais , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...